top of page

10TOESDown Press

Law & Liberty Desk

THE NORTH STAR      THE WHITE ROSE      MILK      FOSTA‑SESTA      ON THE DOCKET      FROM THE WIRE      THE 50‑STATE TRACKER      ABOUT THE DESK

The North Star

“Right is of no Sex — Truth is of no Color.”

After Frederick Douglass, 1847

The free-speech desk — the First Amendment, censorship, and the right to be heard, tracked ruling by ruling across the fifty states.

Jawboning

An Indiana Investigator's House Call Was Coercion, a Judge Rules

A preliminary injunction bars the Indiana Attorney General's chief investigator from threatening a Facebook commenter over posts using the number 86.

The North Star  •  By The North Star Desk  •  Compiled by the 10TOESDown Law Desk  •  October 20, 2026  •  3 min read  •  S.D. Ind.

Illustration: a visit at the door, at dusk.

Illustration: a visit at the door, at dusk. — AI-generated illustration

Judge Sarah Evans Barker granted a preliminary injunction against the Indiana Attorney General's Director of Investigations, finding he likely used the authority of his office to pressure a private citizen into silence after a Facebook post about three state officials.

Judge Sarah Evans Barker granted a preliminary injunction on Oct. 20 against Kurt Spivey, Director of Investigations for the Indiana Attorney General's office, in a First Amendment suit brought by Monroe County resident Lee Lawmaster.

In April, Lawmaster posted the number 86 beside the names of three Indiana officials on Facebook, weeks after the federal indictment of former FBI Director James Comey over a post using the phrase 86 47. Two days later, Spivey came to Lawmaster's home and told him he had crossed the line. Lawmaster was never charged. He stopped commenting on officials' pages.

Barker refused to dismiss the case and found Spivey had likely used his office to pressure Lawmaster into silence. The injunction bars Spivey and anyone acting for the Investigations Division from threatening him with legal sanctions aimed at his past or future posts involving the number.

The opinion sits in the line of jawboning cases running through NRA v. Vullo. The question is not whether a prosecution followed, but whether an official's conduct would make a reasonable person stop speaking. Barker's answer was that an unannounced visit from a state investigator does.

38

Statistic label

That is coercion by any reasonable measure.

— Judge Sarah Evans Barker, U.S. District Court

Video caption

How the case moved

APRIL 2026

Lawmaster posts the number 86 beside three officials' names on Facebook.

MAY 7, 2026

The ACLU of Indiana files Lawmaster v. Spivey.

OCT. 20, 2026

Judge Barker grants a preliminary injunction and denies dismissal.

✓  Fact check

Claim

Claim text

Reality

Reality text

§

Legal References

Bluebook citation · cases, statutes & the record

Primary legal authority cited in this report. Links go to the public record where one exists.

[1]

Lawmaster v. Spivey, Preliminary injunction order, Oct. 20, 2026 ¶ source

U.S. District Court (Indiana) 2026

Academic References

ABA / law-review style · secondary scholarship

Secondary scholarship that informs the analysis.

[1]

Reference text

#Jawboning

#Indiana

#FirstAmendment

#Retaliation

#SocialMedia

Author bio

More from The North Star

A Maryland Judge Puts Flamer Back on the Library Shelf

Book Removals

A Maryland Judge Puts Flamer Back on the Library Shelf

Oct. 22, 2026 · 3 min

Khalil Asks the Justices Whether His Detention Case Can Be Heard at All

First Amendment

Khalil Asks the Justices Whether His Detention Case Can Be Heard at All

Oct. 19, 2026 · 4 min

A Manhattan Judge Bars Penalties for Helping the ICC

Free Speech

A Manhattan Judge Bars Penalties for Helping the ICC

Oct. 13, 2026 · 4 min

NurFüsse · 10TOESDown

The Law & Liberty Desk — three mastheads, one dispatch.

The North Star · The White Rose · Milk — nurfusse.com

bottom of page