VOL. I · NOV. 6, 2026 ● NO. 07 ● FREE SPEECH & THE FIRST AMENDMENT
The North Star
“Right is of no Sex — Truth is of no Color.”
After Frederick Douglass, 1847
The free-speech desk — the First Amendment, censorship, and the right to be heard, tracked ruling by ruling across the fifty states.
Jawboning
An Indiana Investigator's House Call Was Coercion, a Judge Rules
A preliminary injunction bars the Indiana Attorney General's chief investigator from threatening a Facebook commenter over posts using the number 86.

Illustration: a visit at the door, at dusk. — AI-generated illustration
Judge Sarah Evans Barker granted a preliminary injunction against the Indiana Attorney General's Director of Investigations, finding he likely used the authority of his office to pressure a private citizen into silence after a Facebook post about three state officials.
Judge Sarah Evans Barker granted a preliminary injunction on Oct. 20 against Kurt Spivey, Director of Investigations for the Indiana Attorney General's office, in a First Amendment suit brought by Monroe County resident Lee Lawmaster.
In April, Lawmaster posted the number 86 beside the names of three Indiana officials on Facebook, weeks after the federal indictment of former FBI Director James Comey over a post using the phrase 86 47. Two days later, Spivey came to Lawmaster's home and told him he had crossed the line. Lawmaster was never charged. He stopped commenting on officials' pages.
Barker refused to dismiss the case and found Spivey had likely used his office to pressure Lawmaster into silence. The injunction bars Spivey and anyone acting for the Investigations Division from threatening him with legal sanctions aimed at his past or future posts involving the number.
The opinion sits in the line of jawboning cases running through NRA v. Vullo. The question is not whether a prosecution followed, but whether an official's conduct would make a reasonable person stop speaking. Barker's answer was that an unannounced visit from a state investigator does.
38
Statistic label
That is coercion by any reasonable measure.
— Judge Sarah Evans Barker, U.S. District Court
Video caption
How the case moved
APRIL 2026
Lawmaster posts the number 86 beside three officials' names on Facebook.
MAY 7, 2026
The ACLU of Indiana files Lawmaster v. Spivey.
OCT. 20, 2026
Judge Barker grants a preliminary injunction and denies dismissal.
✓ Fact check
Claim
Claim text
Reality
Reality text
§
Legal References
Bluebook citation · cases, statutes & the record
Primary legal authority cited in this report. Links go to the public record where one exists.
[1]
Lawmaster v. Spivey, Preliminary injunction order, Oct. 20, 2026 ¶ source
U.S. District Court (Indiana) 2026
¶
Academic References
ABA / law-review style · secondary scholarship
Secondary scholarship that informs the analysis.
[1]
Reference text
Author bio
Source: ACLU of Indiana
More from The North Star

Book Removals
A Maryland Judge Puts Flamer Back on the Library Shelf

First Amendment
Khalil Asks the Justices Whether His Detention Case Can Be Heard at All

Free Speech
A Manhattan Judge Bars Penalties for Helping the ICC
NurFüsse · 10TOESDown
The Law & Liberty Desk — three mastheads, one dispatch.
The North Star · The White Rose · Milk — nurfusse.com
