VOL. I · NOV. 6, 2026 ● NO. 07 ● LGBTQ+ RIGHTS & THE STATES
Milk
“You gotta give ’em hope.”
After Harvey Milk, 1977
The LGBTQ+ rights desk — gender-affirming care, marriage and family law, school policy, and public accommodations, followed across every statehouse and circuit.
Transgender Sports
Washington and Colorado Voters Will Decide Trans Sports Bans
Two states whose legislatures declined to restrict transgender athletes will put the question directly to voters on Nov. 3.

Illustration: a school gymnasium set up to vote. — AI-generated illustration
Washington's Initiative 638 and Colorado's Proposition 134 would bar transgender girls from girls' school sports, and both reached the ballot by citizen initiative rather than through the legislature. Election Day is Nov. 3.
Voters in Washington and Colorado, two states whose Democratic legislatures declined to pass restrictions of this kind, will decide on Nov. 3 whether to bar transgender girls from girls' school sports, the Associated Press reported Saturday.
Washington's Initiative 638 would require a healthcare provider to verify a student's sex, relying only on reproductive anatomy, genetic makeup, or naturally produced testosterone levels. Backers at Let's Go Washington describe that as a checkbox; opponents say it invites genital examination or costly testing. Colorado's Proposition 134 reaches college competition as well as school sports.
The money is lopsided in both directions. Let's Go Washington, funded by hedge fund manager Brian Heywood, has raised more than $7.8 million across three measures, nearly double its opponents. In Colorado, opponents of Proposition 134 have raised close to $4 million, more than twenty times what proponents have.
A June Quinnipiac poll found roughly seven in ten registered voters opposed to transgender women and girls competing on female teams, with Democrats about evenly split; there is no public polling on the Colorado measure. The development worth marking is the venue. After the Supreme Court upheld state bans earlier this year, the fight is moving from the bench to the electorate, and advocates on both sides are treating these two states as the proof of concept.
$7.8M
Raised by Let's Go Washington across three measures
$4M
Raised by Colorado opponents of Proposition 134
7 in 10
Registered voters opposed to trans women and girls on female teams (Quinnipiac, June 2026)
I don't understand how you can protect kids and discriminate against kids at the same time.
— Nadine Bridges, executive director, One Colorado
Video caption
How the case moved
MARCH 2026
Two measures on transgender youth qualify for Colorado's November ballot.
OCT. 24, 2026
The Associated Press surveys both campaigns ten days out.
NOV. 3, 2026
Election Day in Washington and Colorado.
✓ Fact check
Claim
Claim text
Reality
Reality text
§
Legal References
Bluebook citation · cases, statutes & the record
Primary legal authority cited in this report. Links go to the public record where one exists.
¶
Academic References
ABA / law-review style · secondary scholarship
Secondary scholarship that informs the analysis.
[1]
Reference text
Author bio
Source: Associated Press (via KSAT)
More from Milk

Gender-Affirming Care
Supreme Court Leaves Gender-Affirming Care in Federal Prisons Intact

Schools and Pronouns
A New Jersey District Gives Up Its Notification Policy for Good

Identity Documents
Wyoming Justices Weigh Whether Trans Residents Can Amend Birth Certificates
NurFüsse · 10TOESDown
The Law & Liberty Desk — three mastheads, one dispatch.
The North Star · The White Rose · Milk — nurfusse.com
