top of page

10TOESDown Press

Law & Liberty Desk

THE NORTH STAR      THE WHITE ROSE      MILK      FOSTA‑SESTA      ON THE DOCKET      FROM THE WIRE      THE 50‑STATE TRACKER      ABOUT THE DESK

The North Star

“Right is of no Sex — Truth is of no Color.”

After Frederick Douglass, 1847

The free-speech desk — the First Amendment, censorship, and the right to be heard, tracked ruling by ruling across the fifty states.

Protest Rights

Dissenting Judges Urge Supreme Court to Shield Protest Leaders

After the Fifth Circuit let a negligence suit against activist DeRay Mckesson proceed, six dissenting judges pressed the Supreme Court to decide whether the First Amendment bars such protest-leader liability.

The North Star  •  By The North Star Desk  •  Free-Speech Desk  •  August 1, 2026  •  5 min read  •  5th Cir.

Dissenting Judges Urge Supreme Court to Shield Protest Leaders

Demonstrators marching with signs at a street protest, illustrating the assembly rights at stake in the Mckesson litigation. — AI-generated illustration

As of August 2026, the long-running case against Black Lives Matter organizer DeRay Mckesson remains a flashpoint for protest rights. The Fifth Circuit allowed a theory holding Mckesson potentially liable for an injury inflicted by an unidentified attacker during a 2016 demonstration, and six judges dissented from the denial of rehearing.

The suit was brought by an officer hurt when someone threw an object at a protest Mckesson helped lead. The Fifth Circuit's negligence theory would let organizers be sued for creating allegedly dangerous conditions, even without directing or inciting any violence.

Dissenting judges, led by Judge Don Willett, warned this creates a "negligent protest" doctrine that chills political assembly. They urged the Supreme Court to take the case and reaffirm robust First Amendment protection for demonstration leaders.

The Supreme Court previously vacated an earlier ruling and returned the case for reconsideration. The renewed cert push keeps a central question unresolved: when, if ever, can a protest organizer be held financially responsible for a stranger's violence.

6

Dissenting judges

2016

Year of protest

Pull quote

— Source

Video caption

How the case moved

2016

An officer is injured at a Baton Rouge protest Mckesson helped lead.

2020

Supreme Court vacates a Fifth Circuit ruling and remands.

2023

Fifth Circuit panel again allows the negligence theory to proceed.

AUG 2026

Six judges dissent from denial of rehearing and back a cert petition.

✓  Fact check

Claim

“Protest organizers are automatically liable for any violence that occurs at their demonstrations.”

Reality

The First Amendment generally protects organizers from liability for others' violence absent authorization or incitement; the Mckesson theory remains contested and unresolved.

§

Legal References

Bluebook citation · cases, statutes & the record

Primary legal authority cited in this report. Links go to the public record where one exists.

[1]

Ford v. Mckesson, No. 24-30494 ¶ source

5th Cir. 2026

[2]

Mckesson v. Doe, 592 U.S. 1 ¶ source

U.S. Supreme Court 2020

Academic References

ABA / law-review style · secondary scholarship

Secondary scholarship that informs the analysis.

[1]

Reference text

#ProtestRights

#Assembly

#Negligence

#Mckesson

#FirstAmendment

Author bio

More from The North Star

Kicker

Related headline

Oct 7, 2026

NurFüsse · 10TOESDown

The Law & Liberty Desk — three mastheads, one dispatch.

The North Star · The White Rose · Milk — nurfusse.com

bottom of page